Ramaphosa says ANC wants South Africa to pull out of ICC

South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa said Tuesday his ruling African National Congress (ANC party had resolved that the country should quit the International Criminal Court (ICC, which last month issued an arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The ICC issued an arrest warrant against Putin in March meaning Pretoria, due to host Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa bloc (BRICS summit this year, would have to detain him on arrival.

Read:South Africa vows to keep Russia relations

“Yes, the ANC governing party has taken thatdecision that it is prudent that South Africa should pull out of the ICC,” Ramaphosa said during a press conference co-hosted with the visiting Finland President Sauli Niinisto.

‘Unfair treatment’

Ramaphosa said the decision, which follows a weekend meeting of ANC, was reached ‘largely’ because of what is perceived as the court’s unfair treatment of certain countries.

“We would like this matter of unfair treatment to be properly discussed, but in the meantime the governing party has decided once again that there should be a pull out,” he said.

The arrest warrant against Putin followed accusations that the Kremlin unlawfully deported Ukrainian children.

Read:ICC judges issue arrest warrant for Putin

On whether South Africa would arrest Putin, Ramaphosa said that matter is ‘under consideration’.

A continental powerhouse, South Africa has refused to condemn the invasion of Ukraine which has largely isolated Moscow on the international stage, saying it wants to stay neutral and prefers dialogue to end the war.

It is not the first time South Africa has attempted to withdraw from the ICC.

It tried in 2016 following a dispute a year earlier when the then Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visited the country for an African Union summit. It refused to arrest him despite the then- Sudanese leader facing an ICC arrest warrant over alleged war crimes.

The controversial decision to pull out was, however, revoked when a domestic court ruled such a move would have been unconstitutional.